Permission is not required to use this content. It is available for anyone to email, share, reprint, modify, or repurpose with or without attribution. You are free to alter the content, include it in different works, or use it in any way you see fit.

Attribution is welcomed but not mandatory.

The decision to release these works from copyright stems from a critical view of copyright laws, particularly their application by corporations to maintain large profits while offering minimal benefits to the actual creators. The effectiveness of copyright in genuinely protecting artists is often questioned, as it seems to disproportionately benefit corporate entities over individual creators.

Historical evidence suggests that the reproduction of works did not harm renowned artists in the past, nor did it stifle their creativity or renown. The sharing and adapting of creative works have long been part of artistic innovation, contributing positively to the creative community.

Addressing Common Concerns

Concerns may arise regarding the potential implications of this approach, such as impacts on search engine rankings or financial losses from freely distributed works. However, the philosophy here embraces a broader dissemination of content, seeing it as beneficial rather than detrimental. The concept encourages adaptation and innovation, allowing others to build upon the existing work, which can lead to new and unforeseen creative developments.

This stance advocates for the relinquishment of control over content, promoting a culture of sharing and collaboration. It is grounded in the belief that the free circulation of ideas and creative expressions leads to a richer, more diverse, and innovative community.